Authentic Dasein and the Anxious Uncanny

Works Cited

1- Ames, Van Meter. “Existentialism and the Arts.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 9, No. 3 (March, 1951): 252-256.

2- “ Art: Expressionism’s Father.”TIME Magazine February 17, 2011

3- Aslaksby, Trond. “The Weathered Paintings of Edvard Munch: Artist’s Intention, Conservation, Display-A Triangle of Conflicts.” 1998.Munch Museet . 23, July 2010. < http://www.munch.museum.no/40/6/aslaksby.pdf>

4- Bernstein, Susan. “It Walks: The Ambulatory Uncanny.”MLN Vol. 118, No. 5 (December 2003): 1111-1139.

5- Bischoff, Ulrich.Munch . Köln: Taschen, 2000.

6- Bruin, John. “Heidegger and Two Kinds of Art.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 52, No. 4 (Autumn, 1994): 447-457.

7- Burke, Edmund.A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful . London, 1782.

8- Carroll, Karen Lee. “Artistic Beginnings: The Work of Young Edvard Munch.”Studies in Art Education Vol. 36, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994): 7-17

9- Cassirer, Ernst and Krois, John Michael. “Mind and Life: Heidegger (An Unpublished Manuscript).”Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 16, No. 3 (1983): 160-166.

10- Crockett, Campbell. “Norwegian Arts and Habits.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 14, No. 1 (1955): 58-65

11- Di Piero, W. S. “On Edvard Munch.”The Yale Review Vol. 98, No. 1 (January, 2010): 58-64.

12- Ehrenpreis, David. “The figure of the Backfisch: Representing Puberty in Wilhelmine Germany.Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschicte Vol. 67, No. 4 (2004): 479-508.

13- “Expressive Theory of Art.”Stuckism Wales and the Wrexham Stuckists . Stuckism Wales. Web. June 2011. <stuckismwales.co.uk/theory/tblast/expressive.php>

14- Forssman, Erik. “Edvard Munch: Sein Werk und die Kunstwissenschaft Heute.”Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschite Vol. 3, No. 23 (1994): 521-532.

15- Fricke, Christel. “Explaining the Inexplicable. The Hypotheses of the Faculty of Reflective Judgment in Kant’s Third Critique.”Noûs Vol. 24, No. 1 (March, 1990):45-62.

16- Gerner, Cornelia. “Salome, Vampire and Madonna:  Imager of Women in the Work of Edvard Munch.”Munch Revisited: Edvard Munch and the Art of Today . Ed. Rosemarie E. Pahlke. Dortmund: Kerber Verlag. 2005. 26-34

17- Ginsborg, Hannah*.* “Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology.”Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy .  2005.  February 14, 2010.  < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-aesthetics/>

18- Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Distinction between the Beautiful and the Sublime.”The Review of Metaphysics Vol. 35, (June, 1982): 753-783.

19- Harman, Graham.Heidegger Explained, From Phenomenon to Thing . Illinois: Open Court Publishing, 2007.

20- Harris, Greg.Edvard Munch: By Himself . London: Royal Academy of Arts, 2005.

21- “Heidegger’s Aesthetics.”Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . 4 February, 2010. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. 10 January, 2011. <http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/entries/heidegger-aesthetics/>

22- Heidegger, Martin.Being and Time . Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper Perennial, 2008.

23- -----.History of the Concept of Time . Trans. Ted Sadler. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1992.

24- -----.Poetry, Language, Thought . Trans. Alfred Hofstadter. New York: Perennial, 2001.

25- Hornsby, Roy. “What Heidegger Means by Being-in-the-World.” Jan. 10, 2010. <http: www.royboy.com/philosophy/pages/dasein.html>

26- Hume, Christopher. “Edvard Munch: A Glimpse of the Abyss.”The Toronto Star

27- (March, 1997): 1-2

28- Ingels, Elisabeth.Munch . London: Grange Books, 2005.

29- Jayne, Kristie. “The Cultural Roots of Edvard Munch’s Images of Women.”Woman’s Art Journal Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring-Summer, 1989): 28-34.

30- Kant, Immanuel.The Critique of Judgment . New York: Prometheus Books, 2000.

31- Karpinski, Caroline. “Munch and Lautrec.”The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin (November 1964): 125-134.

32- Kenny, Robert Wade. “The Phenomenology of the Disaster: Toward a Rhetoric of Tragedy.”Philosophy and Rhetoric Vol. 39, No. 2 (2006): 97-124.

33- Kivelitz, George, Regina Selter. “Looking in-Looking out:  Inner and outer Worlds.”Munch Revisited: Edvard Munch and the Art of Today . Ed. Rosemarie E. Palhke.  Gortmund: Kerber Verlag. 2005. 17-25

34- Kroug, Wolfgang. “Das Sein zum Tode be Heidegger und die Probleme des Könnens und der Liebe.”Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung Vol. 7, No. 3 (1953): 392-415.

35- Kuuva, Sari. “Symbol, Munch and Creativity: Metabolism of Visual Symbols” (Dissertation). University of Jyväskylä, Pekka Olsbo, 2010

36- Lacocque, Pierre-Emmanuel and Loeb, Anthony J. “Death Anxiety: A Hidden Factor in Countertransference Hate.”Journal of Religion and Health Vol. 27, No. 2 (Summer, 1988): 95-108.

37- Lathe, Carla. “Edvard Munch’s Dramatic Images 1892-1909.”Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes Vol. 46 (1983): 191-206.

38- Liu, Yu. “The Beautiful and the Sublime: Kant’s Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained.”Studies in Romanticism Vol. 42, No. 2 (Summer, 2003): 187-202

39- Long, Christopher P. “Art’s Fateful Hour: Benjamin, Heidegger, Art and Politics.”New German Critique No. 83 (Spring-Summer, 2001): 89-115.

40- Longman, Lester D. “Contemporary Painting.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 3, No. 9/10 Art in a Post War World (1944): 8-18.

41- Loshak, David. “Space, Time and Edvard Munch.”The Burlington Magazine Vol. 131, No. 1033 (April, 1989): 273-282.

42- Lund, Ida K. “Edvard Munch.”Parnassus Vol. 9, No. 3 (March, 1937): 21-24.

43- “The Masterworks of Edvard Munch.”MoMa No. 10 (1979) Pg. 6.

44- McCarthy, Gerry. “Edvard Munch is Best Known for The Scream but What Was the Angst that Drove Him?”The Sunday Times , September 20, 2009: 10-11.

45- Meinertz, Josef. “Das Sein und das Nichts, Die Angst, der Tod und die Zeit. Grundzüge des Existierens und Grundprobleme der Tiefenpsychologie.”Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung Vol. 9, No. 1 (1955): 32-55.

46- “MoMA Exhibition Explores Edvard Munch’s Compelling Artistic Achievement, Surveying His Career in its Eternity.”The Museum of Modern Art , May 2006. <http://press.moma.org/images/press/PRESS_RELEASE_ARCHIVE/EdvardMunch.pdf> 20 January, 2011.

47- Munch, Edvard.The Private Journals of Edvard Munch . Ed. and trans. J. Gill Holland. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005.

48- Munson, Steven E. “Gauguin’s Genius.”Art Commentary (October, 2002): 61-64

49- Nierhoff, Barbara. “Two Human Beings (The Lonely Ones) - on the role of women and men in the works of Edvard Munch.”Munch Revisited: Edvard Munch and the Art of Today . Ed. Rosemarie E. Pahlke. Dortmund: Kerber Verlag. 2005. 35-43

50- Olson, Marilynn S., Olson, Donald W., and Doescher, Russell L. “On the Blood-Red Sky of Munch’s ‘The Scream’.”Environmental History Vol.12, No. 1 (January, 2007): 131-135.

51- Panchadasi, Swami.The Human Aura: Astral Colors and Thought Forms . Yogi Publication Society, 2007.Project Gutenberg . Web. 22 February, 2011.

52- Park, James. “Existential Anxiety: Angst.” 2008. February 12, 2010. <http://www.tc.umn.edu/%7Eparkx032/CY-SC.html>

53- Salda, F. X. “The Violent Dreamer: Some Remarks on the Work of Edvard Munch.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 28, No. 2 (Winter, 1969): 149-153.

54- Schneede, Uwe M.Edvard Munch: Die frühen Meisterwerke . München: Schirmer/Mosel, 2010

55- Seidel, Ralf.“He Showed his Wounds.” Munch Revisited: Edvard Munch and the Art of Today . Ed. Rosemarie E. Pahlke. Dortmund: Kerber Verlag. 2005. 51-56

56- Sheehan, Thomas. “Heidegger, Martin (1889-1976).”Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Edward Craig, ed. Vol. 4. New York: Routledge, 1998.

57- Singer, Brian, Trond E. Aslaksby, Biljana Topalova-Casadiego, and Tveit, Eva Storevik.  “Investigation of Materials used by Edvard Munch.”Studies in Conservation Vol. 55 (2010): 274-292

58- Singh, R. Raj. “Heidegger and the World in an Artwork.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 48, No. 3 (Summer, 1990): 215-222.

59- Slatkin, Wendy. “Maternity and Sexuality in the 1890s.”Woman’s Art Journal Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring-Summer, 1980): 13-19

60- Smith, John Boulton.Munch . London: Phaidon Press Limited, 2010

61- Steinberg, Norma S. “Munch in Color.”Harvard University Art Museums Bulletin Vol. 3, No. 3 (Spring, 1995): 1-3+7-54.

62- Steinberg, Stanley, Joseph Weiss. “The Art of Edvard Munch and its Function in his Mental Life.”The Psychoanalytic Quarterly Vol. 23 (1954): 409-423.

63- Stulberg, Robert B. “Heidegger and the Origin of the Work of Art: An Explication.”The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol. 32, No. 2 (Winter, 1973): 257-265

64- Schwabsky, Barry. “The Oslo Outsider.”Art in America . New York: Brant, 2006.

65- West, Mara C.Edvard Munch’s ‘To the Forest’: Nature as a Medium and Metaphor. (MA thesis) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2007.

66- Wild, John. “The Philosophy of Martin Heidegger.”The Journal of Philosophy Vol. 60, No. 22 (October, 1963): 664-677.

67- Xani, Kirsten.“Works for People - Anxiety, Illness and Death as Themes of The Frieze of Life .”Munch Revisited: Edvard Munch and the Art of Today . Ed. Rosemarie E. Pahlke. Dortmund: Kerber Verlag. 2005. 44-50

68- Zizek, Slavoj. “Grimaces of the Real, or When the Phallus Appears.”October Vol. 58, (Autumn, 1991): 44-68.

69- Zogaris, Evangeline.Edvard Munch’s Alpha and Omega Series: A Summation of the Frieze of Life Series (MA thesis). The University of British Columbia, British Columbia, 1973.