Devils Deception of the Nasibi Wahabis

Abu Hanifa Disrespected the Prophet in Tarikh Baghdad We Learn That

"Yusuf bin Asbad said if the Prophet met me he would embrace my Fatwas"

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 387

Baghdad also records that:

Imam Abu Hanifa said If you bury a dead body and his heirs need money it is permissible for them to open the grave and sell the shroud Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 394

On the same page Sufyan bin Ayanaa states Abu Hanifa was a person who was the greatest opponent of Allah (swt).

Deobandis look at the Fatwas of your dear Imam and the Fatwas against him. Look at your Imam first rather than focussing your attacks on the Shia. Cursing Abu Hanifa in Syria In Tarikh Baghdad we read:

"Abu Masar states that the Ahl'ul Sunnah Imam from Damascus would curse Abu Hanifa on the pulpit".

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 412

Abu Hanifas students would not send salaams on the Prophet (S) In Tarikh Baghdad we read:

Ibne Mubarak narrates that when I attended Sufyan Suhris gathering we would learn Quran, Hadith, I cannot recall ever hearing them saying Salaams on the Prophet.Ibne Mubarak stated that I have rejected all that I learnt from Abu Hanifa and have asked for forgiveness from Allah (swt).

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 404

Abu Hanifas Students rejected his Ijtihaad In Tarikh Baghdad we read as follows:

"Someone asked Abdullah ibne Mubarak was Numan a Mujtahid he replied he was not a Mujtahid"

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 406

With regards to "Al Hayl" written by Imam Abu Hanifa, Tarikh Baghdad informs us: His student Mubarak states whoever reads al Hayl will deem haraam things halaal and vice versawhoever gives a Fatwa from this book will nullify his marriage. Ibne Mubaraks servant stated that al Hayl author is Shaytan and he himself stated that the writer was worse than the Devil.

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 403

The Prophet forbade his followers from adhering to Abu Hanifa Again in Tarikh Baghdad we are told:

"Muhammad bin Jawad says he saw Rasul in a dream and asked whether he could follow Abu Hanifa the Prophet replied No, no, no".

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 403 Abu Hanifa's disrespect of Abu Bakr In Tarikh Baghdad:

"Muhammad bin Amir Tayr states that in Damascus he saw in a dream a scholar was dragging a man by his shirt, 'This man has destroyed the Deen of Muhammad - I asked and was told that Abu Hanifa was holding Abu Bakr by his collar"

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 413

The Scholars of Hadith have also condemned Imam Abu Hanifa, including al-Bukhari.

Imam Bukhari classified Abu Hanifa as weak

In Risala Tarjee Madhab ai Shafee Imam Ahl'ul Sunnah Allamah Fakhraddin Radhi quoting "Asthaghsai al Ahfhaam":

Ismail al-Bukhari in his Tarikh al Kabeer, Chapter al Meem has mentioned Muhammad bin Idiries Shaafi that died in 204 Hijri, Bukhari was aware that he narrated many Hadith despite this Bukhari did not classify him as a weak narrator, if Shaafi was weak he would have mentioned him in the same way he classified Abu Hanifa as weak before the people. Risala Tarjee Madhab ai Shafee by Allamah Fakhraddin Radhi page 132

So al-Bukhari deems the Imam of the Deobandis as weak. Imam Muslim bin Hajaj classified Abu Hanifa as weak In Tarikh al Baghdad page 421 Volume 13:

"Imam of Ahl'ul Sunnah Muslim bin Hajaaj said Numan bin Thabit never narrated any important Hadith" Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 421

Bukhari and Muslim are your popes / authentic Imams and considered your great Imam as worthless. Whilst these Shaykhs considered your Imam weak and took no hadith from him, they considered Rafidi who you consider kaffir, Shia (who did not adhere to the ways of Abu Bakr, Umar and cursed Muawiya) as reliable and subsequently took hadith from them166. Imam Bukhari in Tarikh Saghir whilst narrating Numan's death quotes the sheer pleasure expressed by Sufyaan al-Thawri. The six Imams of Sihah Sittah did not adhere to the teachings of your Imam. It is indeed sad that you quote Fatwas on Shias and have failed to notify the takfir issued against your own Imam!

By way of example we will cite the name Abd ar-Razzaq as-Sanani who was a famous scholar of hadeeth who lived in Yemen. He died in 211 hijrah. Adh-Dhahabi called him 'one of the most trusted traditionists among all scholars'. [Adh-Dhahabi, Meezan al-itidal, volume 2, page 609] When Ahmad bin Hanbal was asked whether he knew of any hadeeth reported by one better than Abd ar-Razzaq , his answer was negative.

[Adh-Dhahabi, Meezan al-itidal, volume 2, page 614] The importance of Abd ar-Razzaq can be gleaned from the fact that all the six books of Sihaah narrate traditions from him with Bukhari and Muslim narrating over 500 traditions and Ahmad bin Hanbal's Musnad containing well over 1,500 traditions. Hadith were taken from him despite the fact he was openly Shia: Ibn Adi said: Abd ar-Razzaq had numerous hadeeth, and reliable narrators as well as their leaders ha travelled to him and narrated from him. They did not see any problem in his hadeeth except that they attributed Shi'ism to him. He had narrated traditions regarding the virtues [of ahl al-bayt] that none of the trustworthy narrators agreed upon.

His narration of these traditions and those censuring other than them was the reason of their criticism of him. He was a man of honour and there was nothing wrong with him except that he had set forward traditions in praise of the People of the Household (ahl al-bayt) and disparaging others [and these are] abominable. [Al-Mizzi, Tahdheeb al-kamal , volume 18, pages 60-1] Mukhlid al-Shuayri said: I was with 'Abd ar-Razzaq when someone mentioned Mu'awiya.

Abd ar-Razzaq said: 'Do not pollute our assembly by mentioning the descendant of Abu Sufyan!'. [adh-Dhahabi, Meezan al-itidal, volume 2, page 610] He even narrated a hadeeth from the Prophet (s): "If you see Mu'awiyah on my pulpit then kill him!" [adh-Dhahabi, Meezan al-itidal, volume 2, page 613]. Nasibis call Shias Kafirs whilst those they deem Imams, the most meticulous of hadith recorders took hadith from Shias. Would these scholars have taken hadith from Shia if they considered them kafir?

Ahmad bin Shuhaib an-Nasai condemned Abu Hanifa In Tarikh Baghdad we read:

"Imam Nasai declared that Numan Thabit Kufi is an unreliable source of Hadith."

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 421

We also learn:

"Sufyan Suhri declared Abu Hanifa was no authority on Hadith"

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 417

On the same page we read that Abu Bakr Daud states:

"Abu Hanifa recorded 150 Hadith, half of them were false".

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 417

On the same page we read that Hanbal was asked about Abu Hanifa he replied that Abu Hanifas opinions of no value nor the Hadith he narrates.

Again on the same page we learn that:

"Yahya bin Zaeed states that a fistful of mud is better than Abu Hanifa".

Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 417

In Mizan al Kubra, under the chapter "Dhikr Lughman" we read that "Imam Nasai and Ibn Adi declared Abu Hanifa as weak".

The Ulema celebrated when Abu Hanifa died In Baghdad we learn:

When the news of Abu Hanifas death reached Sufyan al-Thawri he praised Allah (swt) who relieved Islam from the Fitnah of Abu Hanifa. Numan weakened every page of Islam. Imam of Ahlul Sunnah Uzay said on his death said That Numan was the most harmful thing to Islam. Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 398

Abu Hanifa was born in 80 Hijri and died in 152 Hijri.

"Hasan Amara the Qadhi of Baghdad read his Janaza, someone dreamt that he was rapped in a black shrewd and was surrounded by Christian priests" Tarikh Baghdad Volume 13 page 422

Even if you Nasibis got together you would have no answer to the fatwas issued against Abu Hanifa. If we rely on these Fatwas then Abu Hanifa was a Kaafir, and Deobandi Nasibis, Tarikh Baghdad is not the only weapon we have up our sleeve read on, if you dare.

Imam Ghazzali said Abu Hanifa was not a Mujtahid In "al Munhaul", Imam Ghazzali Tusi al Iraani writes as follows:

After the fourth level of respect comes the Mujtahids, commenting upon the authenticity of the different Mujtahids Imam Ghazaali writes, Imam Malik was a Mujtahid, Abu Hanifa was not a Mujtahid because he acquired no knowledge in Arabic Grammar and was illiterate, this is proven by the fact that he read the words Babu Qays when the correct pronunciation is Babi Qays. Abu Hanifa had no knowledge of Hadith, he would ignore correct Hadith and would embrace weak ones, he had no capacity to interpret the Sharia, in its opposition he practised and developed Qiyaas (analogical reasoning).

Taken from Asthaghsa al Ahfaam quoting Munkhaul, by Allamah Ghazzali Tusi al Iraani page 197 published Majmaa al Juraayn Ludhanan (1276 Hijri)

Imam Abu Hanifa was ignorant of Arabic as admitted by Ibne Khalikan In Tarikh ibne Khalikaan page 419:

Imam Abu Hanifa has many virtues as highlighted by Baghdad who also noted his criticism better if hed avoided this but it is fact he was ignorant of Arabic

Tarikh ibne Khalikaan page 419

Quran and Hadith are in Arabic and the one without command of both cannot be deemed as a Mujtahid.

Imam Ghazzali declaration that Deobandis ninety percent of Imam Abu Hanifas Fatwas are wrong In al Munhaul Imam Ghazzali also attacks Imam Abu Hanifa as follows:

"Ghazzali copied the words of Qadhi Abu Bakr Muhammad bin Tayyib Basri in Muhuul Volume 3 in which he discussed Qiyas he said I am not opposed to Abu Hanifa but I am sure that Abu Hanifa made mistakes in ninety percent of his Fatwas and in Knowledge of Usul he made mistakes".

Taken from Asthaghsa al Ahfaam quoting Munkhaul, by Allamah Ghazzali Tusi al Iraani page 197 published Majmaa al Juraayn Ludhanan (1276 Hijri)

Imam Ghazzalis declaration that twenty per cent of Abu Hanifas madhab was refuted by his students In Munhaul taken from Istakhza page 192:

"Imam Ghazzali at the end of Munul on issues of Sharia painting the picture Abu Hanifa used his own hot mind which is why he hasmade so many mistakes and due to this his two teacher Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad said that following 20% of what he said would discredit the religion, because they found major mistakes in his Fatwas".

Taken from Asthaghsa al Ahfaam quoting Munkhaul, by Allamah Ghazzali Tusi al Iraani page 192 published Majmaa al Juraayn Ludhanan (1276 Hijri)

Imam Ghazzalis declaration Abu Hanifa turned Sharia on its head Ghazzali said Imam Abu Hanifa turned Sharia on it head and made it questionable and changed the Sharia, and proving the falsity of Hanifa Madhab is no secret on the issue Salat any ordinary Sunni Muslim would not accept his explanations of how to practice Salat.

Taken from Asthaghsa al Ahfaam quoting Munkhaul, by Allamah Ghazzali Tusi al Iraani page 192 published Majmaa al Juraayn Ludhanan (1276 Hijri)